milkovich wrote:allstars : hingis was better than venus in my and others opinion, that 200+ weeks nb.1 it means she got almost in every tournament quarters, semis, and rup in grand slams & masters
milkovich wrote:allstars : hingis was better than venus in my and others opinion, that 200+ weeks nb.1 it means she got almost in every tournament quarters, semis, and rup in grand slams & masters
solo wrote:milkovich wrote:allstars : hingis was better than venus in my and others opinion, that 200+ weeks nb.1 it means she got almost in every tournament quarters, semis, and rup in grand slams & masters
Success at a tournament means you win it not make the quarters, semis, and rup
Losing in the final and losing in the 1st is the same cause that means you have lost.
btw:
venus won 7 slams and was runner-up at another 7 slams.
hingis won 5 slams and was runner-up at another 7 slams.
solo wrote:milkovich wrote:allstars : hingis was better than venus in my and others opinion, that 200+ weeks nb.1 it means she got almost in every tournament quarters, semis, and rup in grand slams & masters
Success at a tournament means you win it not make the quarters, semis, and rup
Losing in the final and losing in the 1st is the same cause that means you have lost.
btw:
venus won 7 slams and was runner-up at another 7 slams.
hingis won 5 slams and was runner-up at another 7 slams.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest